Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a global score of 79.8 against 74.4. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z4 has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Moto Z4's body is much newer, a bit thinner and way lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Motorola Moto Z4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. The Moto Z4 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little higher display density.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto Z4 captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way larger sensor, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.