Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is way newer, just a bit lighter and way thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a little longer battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.