Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is a lot better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. The Galaxy A71 5G design is way newer and somewhat lighter, but also a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little greater pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.