Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a general score of 84.9 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is notably newer than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy A80 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit greater display pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A80 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A80 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.