Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit higher display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little bigger screen.
Vivo X60 Pro features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features greater battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Vivo X60 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.