Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a general score of 85.5 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is incredibly newer and lighter, but somewhat thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with way less MP, and they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features greater battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.