Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is slightly better than the iPhone 11 Pro Max's global score of 85.3. Although Galaxy A90 5G and iPhone 11 Pro Max were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy A90 5G design is just a little bit thicker but a little lighter. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, while iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less and slower CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixel number per inch of display and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3969mAh.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots better photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.