Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A90 5G, with a score of 93.3 against 90.5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is noticeably newer, a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A90 5G. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit greater display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G captures better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in poorly lited environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.