Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is just a bit better than Galaxy A90 5G, getting a 93.2 score against 90.5. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS. The iPhone 13 Pro Max design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Galaxy A90 5G.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a greater processing power than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a just a little greater screen density and a slightly higher 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy A90 5G features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A90 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G features a little better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.