Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is a bit better than iPhone X's 88.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than iPhone X. IPhone X has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has lesser and slower cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X features just a bit better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.