Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than the iPhone XR's 82 global score. The Galaxy A90 5G is a a little bit heavier phone than iPhone XR, but they have the same thickness. The Apple iPhone XR has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less and slower cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XR features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a just a little lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen. Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a way better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.