Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, with a 90.5 score against 84.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is newer than Apple iPhone XS, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. The iPhone XS has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XS counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a little better pixel density. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.