Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is way newer and a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Google Pixel. The Google Pixel has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.