Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Google Pixel 3, getting a global score of 90.5 against 80. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G is newer than Google Pixel 3, it's a lot heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.