Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a 90.5 score against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than Google Pixel 3 XL. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.