Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A90 5G construction is a bit thicker and a lot heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A90 5G has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.