Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4's global score of 81.9. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is a better phone than Google Pixel 4, we must note that it's also noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 4's CPU is just as good as Galaxy A90 5G's CPU, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Galaxy A90 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.