Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL, having a score of 90.5 against 82.9. Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, we must tell that it's also just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the Google Pixel 4 XL count with similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A90 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more MP camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.