Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a score of 90.5 against 87.5. Even being the best device in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while Google Pixel 4a 5G works with Android 11 operating system.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.