Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 5, getting a 90.5 score against 89. The Galaxy A90 5G body is older, a little bit thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 5. Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount per screen inch.
Galaxy A90 5G features a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.