Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than the HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G is a lot heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and newer. Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 operating system.
The HTC One M9 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The HTC One M9 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A90 5G has a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.