Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the HTC U11, having a general score of 90.5 against 77.6. The Galaxy A90 5G construction is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the HTC U11. Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.