Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while LG G7 Fit comes with Android 8.1 Oreo OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The LG G7 Fit has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A90 5G has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.