Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer, but just a bit thicker and extremely heavier than LG G7 ThinQ. Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and LG G7 ThinQ comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The Galaxy A90 5G shoots better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.