Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. The Galaxy A90 5G is a newer device than LG V30S ThinQ, but it is thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Galaxy A90 5G features a little better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.