Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a 90.5 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as the Galaxy A90 5G one, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A90 5G captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features greater battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.