Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a score of 90.5 against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better screen density. The LG V40 ThinQ has a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy A90 5G one, they have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.