Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a 90.5 score against 87.6. Although Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the LG V60 ThinQ were released with only 7 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a bit thinner and a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 operating system.
The LG V60 ThinQ's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy A90 5G one, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G one, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a little greater pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A90 5G has a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much lower (4K) video quality, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, a camera in the back with a way lower resolution and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and images.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.