Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Forged Green |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Motorola Defy (2021), having a overall score of 90.5 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Motorola Defy (2021) counts with Android 11 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is an older device than the Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A90 5G has a better looking display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger display and a better display density.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Defy (2021) has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.