Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Surfing blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Moto G 5G Plus, although it was released around 10 months before. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G one, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a just a little better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, they both have a same size display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels resolution and a 0.5 inches sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.