Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), having a general score of 90.5 against 82.1. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), despite of the fact that it was released just 22 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) works with Android 11 OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a little higher screen density. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features just a bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a little better battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.