Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it is a little heavier and was released many years before.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a bit larger display. Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a tinier aperture, a camera in the back with lesser MP and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.