Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Moto G8 Power, with a 90.5 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than the Moto G8 Power, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G8 Power features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.