Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's global score of 76.4. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is way newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is thicker and notably heavier. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G has improved battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.