Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 90.5 against 77.4. Although the Galaxy A90 5G is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is a lot thicker and much heavier. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.