Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Oxford blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G's overall score of 84.6. The Galaxy A90 5G is an older cellphone than Motorola One 5G, but Samsung was able to make it a bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola One 5G both count with incredibly similar displays, and although the Motorola One 5G has a quite higher screen pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rates, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a 48 MP back-facing camera.
Motorola One 5G counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.