Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a score of 90.5 against 79.8. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while Motorola One Hyper works with Android 11 operating system. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola One Hyper were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A90 5G construction is a little heavier but also a little bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A90 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.