Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a global score of 90.5 against 79.2. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) works with Android 15 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a back-facing camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.