Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than the Nokia 9 PureView's overall score of 76.4. Although Galaxy A90 5G is better than Nokia 9 PureView, it must be told that it's also a a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G and the Nokia 9 PureView feature extremely similar processing units, both of them have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with superior battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.