Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Ocean |
| Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a general score of 90.5 against 83.1. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with Android 10 OS. Even though Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a little lighter and a little bit thinner.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and a 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.