Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 score. Even being the best phone in this review, the Galaxy A90 5G body is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G works with Android 11 OS.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a just a bit better pixels number in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.