Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G comes with Android 14 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it's just a little heavier.
Galaxy A90 5G has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A90 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, a lesser megapixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.