Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A30's general score of 79.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is an a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A30. The Galaxy A90 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Galaxy A90 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a way better (4K) video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.