Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51, getting a 90.5 score against 87.7. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Samsung Galaxy M51 comes with Android 10 operating system. Galaxy A90 5G's design is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M51, even though it was released a bit more over a year before.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixel number in each inch of screen. Galaxy A90 5G and Galaxy M51 both count with really similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy M51 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy M51 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.