Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is noticeably newer, but a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.