Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10, getting a score of 90.5 against 88.3. Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A90 5G construction is noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy S10.
The Galaxy S10 has a processing unit that's just as good as the Galaxy A90 5G one, and although the Galaxy S10 has more RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S10 has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixel count per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy A90 5G, both have the same internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A90 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.