Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 score. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 operating system. The Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much powerful processor than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A90 5G has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a better resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.