Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a 90.5 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.