Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is somewhat lighter and much thinner.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A90 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot better 48 MP resolution camera and a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Galaxy XCover FieldPro feature similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.