Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 90.5 score against 81. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Galaxy XCover Pro works with Android 11 operating system. Even when Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the Galaxy XCover Pro were released with only 5 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is thinner and just a little lighter.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that's very similar to Galaxy A90 5G's screen, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little higher pixels amount per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.